Multicriteria fuzzy decision-making problems based on vague set theory
By D. Hong, Chang-Hwan Choi. Fuzzy Sets Syst., 2000
1,031 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Control and Systems Engineering, Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/56ae80a803611cea96c8ecc9f06816964dca9b57
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Control and Systems Engineering
In Management Science and Operations Research
In Statistics and Probability
Citations in the corpus
- Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets (2006, methodology): “Hong and Choi (2000) showed that the relation between the score function S and the accuracy function H is similar to the relation between mean and variance in statistics.”
- An approach to multiattribute decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy assessments and incomplete weights (2009, methodology): “For instance, attribute values have been relaxed to 94 be a range rather than an exact value [4, 6, 14, 18, 20, 22, 27-30, 33-35, 38], and 95 incomplete attribute weight information has also been extensively investigated from 96 different perspectives [18, 26, 36].”
- GRA method for multiple attribute decision making with incomplete weight information in intuitionistic fuzzy setting (2010, methodology): “And then Hong and Choi [7] provided another technique for handling multiple attribute fuzzy decision-making problems based on vague set theory, they provided new functions to measure the degree of accuracy in the grades of membership of each alternative with respect to a set of attribute.”
- Multicriteria fuzzy decision-making methods based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets (2007, methodology): “And then Dug Hun Hong and Chang-Hwan Choi [6] provided another techniques for handling multicriteria fuzzy decision-making problems based on vague set theory, they provided new functions to measure the degree of”
- A systematic review and meta-Analysis of SWARA and WASPAS methods: Theory and applications with recent fuzzy developments (2017, neutral): “Hong and Choi [113], used the maximum and”
- Intuitionistic fuzzy Choquet integral operator for multi-criteria decision making (2010, methodology): “Based on vague sets, Chen and Tan (1994), Hong and Choi (2000) utilized the minimum and maximum operations and different measure functions to develop some approximate technique for handling multi-attribute decision making problems under fuzzy environment.”
- Approaches to multiple attribute group decision making based on intuitionistic fuzzy power aggregation operators (2011, background): “Later, Hong and Choi [7] defined the accuracy function ha to evaluate the accuracy degree of a: sa 1⁄4 la va ð5Þ ha 1⁄4 la þ va ð6Þ Based on the score function and the accuracy function, Xu and Yager [21], Xu [14] gave an order relation between any two IFNs: Definition 2 ([14,21]).”
- Vague groups (2005, neutral): “A Vague set (VS) [1-5] uses a truth grade of membership and a false grade of membership to indicate the positive evidence and the negative evidence respectively.”
- Intuitionistic Fuzzy Aggregation Operators (2007, methodology): “Later, Hong and Choi [26] defined an accuracy function to evaluate the degree of accuracy of the intuitionistic fuzzy value as (5) where .”
- Intuitionistic Fuzzy Information Aggregation Using Einstein Operations (2012, methodology): “[34] D. H. Hong and C. H. Choi, “Multicriteria fuzzy decision-making problems based on vague set theory,” Fuzzy Sets Syst., vol. 114, no. 1, pp. 103– 113, 2000.”
- Fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making techniques and applications - Two decades review from 1994 to 2014 (2015, neutral): “The aggregation techniques have a great effect on the MCDM problems, and the aggregation operators have been broadly applied to MCDM.”
- Environmental decision-making under uncertainty using intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (IF-AHP) (2009, methodology): “There are some reported applications of IFS in MCDM, e.g., Liu and Wang (2006), Li (2005), Atanassov et al. (2002), and Hong and Choi (2000).”