Adding complex trophic interactions to a size-spectral plankton model: emergent diversity patterns and limits on predictability
By N. Banas. 2011
95 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Genetics, Global and Planetary Change, Oceanography
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/56abb7926b75745e20e67b71c13123ac7e437013
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Genetics
In Global and Planetary Change
In Oceanography
- Michael J. Follows
- Bess Ward
- S. Dutkiewicz
- O. Jahn
- T. Kiørboe
- Elena Litchman
- André W. Visser
- K. H. Andersen
Citations in the corpus
- Trait-based approaches to zooplankton communities (2013, background): “Models that include frequency distributions of particle sizes ingested by different groups of grazers are starting to be implemented and provide a more realistic description of food web interactions (Armstrong, 1999; Banas, 2011).”
- Maximal feeding with active prey-switching: A kill-the-winner functional response and its effect on global diversity and biogeography (2014, unknown): “Selective feeding is known to be an important component underpinning the assembly rules of predator–prey communities (Grover, 1994; Loreau, 2010) and the size-structure of marine communities (Armstrong, 1994; Poulin and Franks, 2010; Banas, 2011).”
- A trait-based approach to ocean ecology (2018, background): “While the latter two issues are now being developed, current multi-trophic trait-based models are mainly size based (Banas, 2011; Ward et al., 2012) with a few exceptions (Pahlow et al.”
- On the roles of cell size and trophic strategy in North Atlantic diatom and dinoflagellate communities (2013, background): “Cell size is increasingly used to structure trait-based plankton community models, and determines, in part, the roles of the phytoplankton community in biogeochemical cycles and the marine food web (Baird and Suthers 2007; Banas 2011).”
- Who is eating whom? Morphology and feeding type determine the size relation between planktonic predators and their ideal prey (2012, methodology): “After the pioneer works of Moloney & Field (1991) and Armstrong (2003), a cohort of size-based plank ton food web models has recently been developed (e.g. Baird 2010, Fuchs & Franks 2010, Zhou et al. 2010, Banas 2011).”
- A size‐structured food‐web model for the global ocean (2012, background): “2007), have motivated the development of marine ecosystem and biogeochemistry models towards the explicit representation of phytoplankton size classes (Moloney and Field 1991; Baird and Suthers 2007; Banas 2011).”