Evaluation of the interactive effects of air exposure duration and water temperature on the condition and survival of angled and released fish

By Andrew J. Gingerich, S. Cooke, K. Hanson, M. Donaldson, C. Hasler, C. Suski, Robert Arlinghaus. 2007

162 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Immunology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/56ab76b34f8e7774490650f285ef5292cb2365b0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Immunology

1. S. Cooke
2. C. O’Connor
3. Robert Arlinghaus
4. Timothy D. Clark
5. K. Hanson
6. S. Hinch
7. G. Raby
8. C. Suski

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. S. Cooke
2. S. Hinch
3. M. Donaldson
4. A. Danylchuk
5. Robert Arlinghaus
6. D. Patterson
7. G. Raby
8. C. Suski

Citations in the corpus

• The physiological consequences of catch‐and‐release angling: perspectives on experimental design, interpretation, extrapolation and relevance to stakeholders (2013, methodology): “Future studies on air exposure have shown that exposure to air only kills fish in situations where unrealistically large exposure times are employed (Gingerich et al. 2007) and in very sensitive species (e.g. pike-perch, Sander lucioperca L.; Arlinghaus & Hallerman 2007), while zero mortality of…”
• FISH Out of WATER: How Much Air is Too Much? (2015, background): “Gingerich et al. (2007) demonstrated that air exposure up to 16 min resulted in minimal mortality of Bluegill Lepomis macrochirus at low and moderate water temperatures (18.2°C, 22.8°C), but the same treatment after removal from warm water (27.4 °C) resulted in much higher mortality.”
• The understudied and underappreciated role of predation in the mortality of fish released from fishing gears (2014, background): “The result is an accumulation of anaerobic metabolites in body tissues that must be cleared following release before the full exercise capacity of the fish is restored, a period during which it may be vulnerable (e.g. Davie and Kopf 2006; Gingerich et al. 2007; Arlinghaus et al. 2009).”
• Physiological and behavioural consequences of catch-and-release angling on northern pike (Esox lucius L.) (2009, unknown): “This air exposure duration thus constitutes an upper air exposure threshold in pike if the intention is to avoid behavioural impairments in terms of swimming activity post release, but this threshold potentially only holds for rather moderate water temperatures and may be lower at higher water tempe”