Metapopulation theory and northern cod population structure: interdependency of subpopulations in recovery of a groundfish population

By R. Kent Smedbol, J. Wroblewski. 2002

158 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Lessons learned from practical approaches to reconcile mismatches between biological population structure and stock units of marine fish (2017, background): “…Geffen et al., 2011), with the majority of species exhibiting complex structure within this range (e.g. horse mackerel Trachurus trachurus, Abaunza et al., 2008; redfish Sebastes mentella, Cadrin et al., 2010; cod Gadus morhua, Smedbol and Wroblewski 2002; Wright et al., 2006, Kelly et al., 2009).”
Stock collapses and their recovery: mechanisms that establish and maintain life-cycle closure in space and time (2010, background): “Large marine fish stocks are now recognized to represent meta-populations (McQuinn, 1997; Smedbol and Wroblewski, 2002; Kritzer and Sale, 2004), where components displaying different patterns (contingents) may be linked by straying of individuals through dispersal in the larval, juvenile and/or…”
An overview of recent global experience with recovery plans for depleted marine resources and suggested guidelines for recovery planning (2004, background): “The serious implica- tions of a loss of meta-population structure are also emerging (see Smedbol and Wroblewski, 2002).”
Moving beyond the current paradigm in marine population connectivity: are adults the missing link? (2014, background): “In metapopulations, structure develops through breeding, exchange of individuals and extirpation events (Hanski and Gilpin 1991; Hanski and Simberloff 1997; Smedbol and Wroblewski 2002).”