Fast Convergence Rates of Distributed Subgradient Methods With Adaptive Quantization

By Thinh T. Doan, Siva Theja Maguluri, Justin K. Romberg. 2018

75 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We study distributed optimization problems over a network when the communication between the nodes is constrained, and therefore, information that is exchanged between the nodes must be quantized. Recent advances using the distributed gradient algorithm with a quantization scheme at a fixed resolution have established convergence, but at rates significantly slower than when the communications are unquantized. In this article, we introduce a novel quantization method, which we refer to as adaptive quantization, that allows us to match the convergence rates under perfect communications. Our approach adjusts the quantization scheme used by each node as the algorithm progresses: as we approach the solution, we become more certain about where the state variables are localized and adapt the quantizer codebook accordingly. We bound the convergence rates of the proposed method as a function of the communication bandwidth, the underlying network topology, and structural properties of the constituent objective functions. In particular, we show that if the objective functions are convex or strongly convex, then using adaptive quantization does not affect the rate of convergence of the distributed subgradient methods when the communications are quantized, except for a constant that depends on the resolution of the quantizer. To the best of our knowledge, the rates achieved in this article are better than any existing work in the literature for distributed gradient methods under finite communication bandwidths. We also provide numerical simulations that compare convergence properties of the distributed gradient methods with and without quantization for solving distributed regression problems for both quadratic and absolute loss functions.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computational Mechanics, Computer Networks and Communications

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Ahmed Khaled
  2. Dmitry Kovalev
  3. Peter Richtárik
  4. Adil Salim
  5. Martin Tak'avc
  6. S. Chraibi
  7. Nicolas Loizou
  8. Filip Hanzely

In Computational Mechanics

  1. Ahmed Khaled
  2. Dmitry Kovalev
  3. Peter Richtárik
  4. Adil Salim
  5. Martin Tak'avc
  6. S. Chraibi
  7. Nicolas Loizou
  8. Martin Takác

In Computer Networks and Communications

  1. Ahmed Khaled
  2. Martin Tak'avc
  3. Dmitry Kovalev
  4. S. Chraibi
  5. Adil Salim
  6. Peter Richtárik
  7. Nicolas Loizou
  8. Martin Takác

Citations in the corpus