Challenges and opportunities of genetic approaches to biological conservation.

By R. Frankham. 2010

549 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/566080c70c6203de32f2fbe3bf7caf2294885d09

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

In Molecular Biology

Citations in the corpus

Ex Situ and In Situ Conservation of Agricultural Biodiversity: Major Advances and Research Needs (2010, background): “A major challenge remains to develop simple inexpensive means to monitor genetic diversity at a global scale (Frankham, 2010).”
Assessing the Relevance of Herbarium Collections as Tools for Conservation Biology (2017, background): “Based on criteria to maximize genetic diversity and/or the presence of exclusive alleles (Falk & Holsinger, 1991; Frankham, 2010; Namoff et al., 2010), these studies are very useful in species conservation, as they allow to prioritize certain populations and protect them in situ and ex situ (either ”
The importance of considering genetic diversity in shark and ray conservation policies (2017, result): “As advised in previous studies (Frankham 2010, 2014; Laikre 2010; Rivers et al.”
Assessing population structure in the face of isolation by distance: Are we neglecting the problem? (2018, background): “…population structure is a crucial step to develop effective conservation strategies, especially for the genetic management of threatened wild populations, identification of management units, recovery of populations experiencing inbreeding depression, along with other applications (Frankham, 2010).”
Founder events predict changes in genetic diversity during human‐mediated range expansions (2011, background): “Therefore, future studies should compare genetic variation and divergence at both neutral and coding regions of the genome to provide further insights into the role of evolutionary responses in introduced populations and its relationship to genetic variation (Frankham, 2010; Ouborg et al., 2010; Pie”
BA3‐SNPs: Contemporary migration reconfigured in BayesAss for next‐generation sequence data (2019, background): “Yet these considerations are complicated both philosophically and methodologically, as they reflect the underlying tension between taxonomy, conservation and the immediacy of adaptive management (Frankham, 2010).”
Translating conservation genetics into management: Pan-European minimum requirements for dynamic conservation units of forest tree genetic diversity (2013, background): “Considering the real-life fact that resources are limited for conservation, Frankham et al. (2002) proposed that maintaining 90% of genetic diversity for 100 years is a reasonable goal for genetic management of conservation populations.”
Genetic Diversity and Conservation Units: Dealing With the Species-Population Continuum in the Age of Genomics (2018, background): “More broadly we echo recommendations made recently in a number reviews (Frankham, 2010; Santamaría and Méndez, 2012; Hoban et al., 2013; Moritz and Potter, 2013; Laity et al., 2015; Pierson et al., 2016; Cook and Sgrò, 2017; Taylor et al., 2017) that highlight the need for scientists to improve comm”
Bridging the gap: a genetic assessment framework for population‐level threatened plant conservation prioritization and decision‐making (2016, background): “…is a strong connection between researchers and practitioners, such as where scientists are embedded in a conservation agency, or when practitioners have directly solicited the research (Hogbin et al., 2000; Knight et al., 2008; Mace & Purvis, 2008; Frankham, 2010; Hulme, 2014; Guerin et al., 2015).”
Genetic and demographic population management in zoos and aquariums: recent developments, future challenges and opportunities for scientific research (2011, background): “Fragmentation offers benefits and drawbacks – although genetic adaptation to captivity tends to happen more quickly in larger vs smaller populations (Woodworth et al., 2002), smaller populations experience more genetic drift and accumulate inbreeding faster (Frankham et al., 2010).”