Nutrient use efficiencies and leaching of organic and conventional cropping systems in Sweden

By G. Torstensson, H. Aronsson, L. Bergström. 2006

155 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Environmental Chemistry, Soil Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/562f6bab4ee3a020ec10231e611c94fb3ff25823

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. J. Timsina
2. David W. Macdonald
3. Hanna Tuomisto
4. J. Soininen

In Environmental Chemistry

1. Hanna Tuomisto

In Soil Science

1. J. Timsina
2. Vagner A. Benedito
3. Hanna Tuomisto

Citations in the corpus

• Does organic farming reduce environmental impacts?--a meta-analysis of European research. (2012, methodology): “Some studies showed that conventional systems that used best practices for reducing environmental impacts while producing higher yields tend to lead to the lowest environmental impacts often even on an area basis (Basset-Mens and van der Werf, 2005; Korsaeth, 2008; Torstensson et al., 2006).”
• Can Organic Sources of Nutrients Increase Crop Yields to Meet Global Food Demand? (2018, background): “[51] also demonstrated from long-term field studies in Sweden that N losses through leaching were higher in organic than in conventional systems.”
• Organic versus Conventional Cropping Sustainability: A Comparative System Analysis (2018, background): “Torstensson et al., 2006 [17] Over a 6-year period, leaching loads of N were found to be the smallest in fields using integrated practices, particularly those utilizing cover crops 25 kg N ha − 1 year − 1 .”