Two-dimensional SPH simulations of wedge water entries

By Guillaume Oger, Mathieu Doring, Bertrand Alessandrini, Pierre Ferrant. Journal of Computational Physics, 2006

436 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/562b92d9b1361361318e112a515cbdc1e7ecf560

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computational Mechanics

Citations in the corpus

Hydroelasticity in water-entry problems: Comparison between experimental and SPH results (2012, result): “As an example, in [23] 21 millions particles are needed to obtain results similar to Wagner’s results for the water entry of a rigid wedge.”
Permeable and non‐reflecting boundary conditions in SPH (2009, background): “[1] and Kajtar and Monaghan [2] give recent examples.”
An improved SPH method: Towards higher order convergence (2007, background): “Note that this link exists even for more complicated problems (see for instance [2]).”
Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH): an Overview and Recent Developments (2010, background): “, air cushion effects in a wedge water entry [382], waves produced by a falling mass into a reservoir [383], water entry of a free-falling object [190], and wedge water entries [384].”
Smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) for free-surface flows: past, present and future (2016, neutral): “For many problems in hydrodynamics, instead of allowing the particle interdistance to vary gradually, the use of regions of nested resolutions predefined by the modeller has been found to be acceptable (Oger et al., 2006, Omidvar et al., 2012, 2013).”
Incompressible smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) with reduced temporal noise and generalised Fickian smoothing applied to body–water slam and efficient wave–body interaction (2013, methodology): “However in [23], a variable initial particle distribution has been employed in order to provide very fine spatial resolution around the impact zone, while maintaining acceptable computational costs.”
Incompressible SPH simulation of water entry of a free‐falling object (2009, methodology): “[12] suggested that the value of should be chosen so that in a Cartesian particle distribution, the neighboring numbers do not differ from the ones obtained in a radius equal to 2h.”
State-of-the-art of classical SPH for free-surface flows (2010, background): “2008), the interaction of solids with liquid (Oger et al. 2006) simulating wedge water entries, the simulation of flows in Pelton turbines (Marongiu et al.”