Ceasefire capitalism: military–private partnerships, resource concessions and military–state building in the Burma–China borderlands

355 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Rethinking the Role of State-owned Enterprises in China’s Rise (2017, background): “While investors, senior generals and ethnic-minority ceasefire group leaders profited from this ‘ceasefire capitalism’ (Woods 2011), most people did not, instead enduring environmental devastation, forced displacement and militarisation.”
The Political Economy of Myanmar’s Transition (2014, background): “…grievance is intensifying as land grabs, forced displacement and landlessness, associated particularly with agribusiness development, mining and infrastructure development and typically occurring with the connivance of state agencies, become increasingly commonplace (Woods 2011, 765–767; TNI 2011).”