Global analysis of three-flavor neutrino masses and mixings

By G. Fogli, E. Lisi, A. Marrone, A. Palazzo. 2005

318 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present a comprehensive phenomenological analysis of a vast amount of data from neutrino flavor oscillation and non-oscillation searches, performed within the standard scenario with three massive and mixed neutrinos, and with particular attention to subleading effects. The detailed results discussed in this review represent a state-of-the-art, accurate and up-to-date (as of August 2005) estimate of the three-neutrino mass-mixing parameters.

Subfields: Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/55fde819e036595ed9e62771a66a6b15ad586ca5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

Citations in the corpus

Global constraints on absolute neutrino masses and their ordering (2017, background): “These observables probe the neutrino mass spectrum in different and complementary ways [1,2].”
Observables sensitive to absolute neutrino masses. II (2008, methodology): “older one, found in the atmospheric ν data analysis of [3], and a newer one, coming from the small difference between the best-fit values of sin(2) 2θ12 in KamLAND [5] and SNO [7]—a difference which is reduced for sin 2 θ13 ∼ few %.”
A lower bound on the mass of dark matter particles (2008, background): “[50–52] for a review) and the Dark Matter in the Universe, without introducing any new physics above electro-weak scale MW ∼ 100 GeV.”
Global analysis of neutrino masses, mixings and phases: entering the era of leptonic CP violation searches (2012, methodology): “A slight preference for nonmaximal mixing emerged also from our analysis of K2K LBL data in [4].”
Evidence of $\theta_{13}$>0 from global neutrino data analysis (2011, methodology): “In [2] we argued that the weak preference for both sin(2) θ13 > 0 and cos δ < 0 were tied by the interference term driven by δm(2) and θ13 [35] in the atmospheric neutrino oscillation probability.”
Sneutrino cold dark matter, a new analysis: Relic abundance and detection rates (2007, background): “Solar and atmospheric neutrino results [23, 24, 25, 26, 27] as well as cosmological bounds on massive light neutrinos [27, 104, 105] are not compatible with the kinematical bounds on muon and tau neutrinos listed above, unless more than 3 families are present and/or additional sterile neutrinos are ”
Neutrino Mass from Cosmology (2012, background): “More on neutrino oscillations and their implications can be found in other contributions to this Special Issue or any of the existing reviews such as [21, 22, 23], to which we refer the reader for more details.”
Neutrino Oscillations and Non-standard Interactions (2017, background): “Another piece of evidence for a non-zero value of θ 13 was obtained from the combination of atmospheric and long-baseline neutrino data [71, 72].”
Neutrino masses and mixings: Status of known and unknown 3ν parameters (2016, background): “Note that we define the parameter ∆m2, driving the dominant LBL oscillations, as ∆m2 = m(2)3 − (m(2)1 + m(2)2)/2 , (1) in both NH (∆m2 > 0) and IH (∆m2 < 0) [37, 38].”