Determination of geometrical factors in Layerwise Laser Melting using optical process monitoring
By T. Craeghs, S. Clijsters, E. Yasa, F. Bechmann, S. Berumen, Jean-Pierre Kruth. 2011
184 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Automotive Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/55f282bc1d689e3c97726632da792811b9416770
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Automotive Engineering
In Mechanical Engineering
Citations in the corpus
- Process defects and in situ monitoring methods in metal powder bed fusion: a review (2017, unknown): “Size Clijsters et al., 2014; Craeghs et al., 2010 - 2011; Craeghs et al., 2010 - 2012; Clijsters et al., 2014; Berumen et al., 2010; Kruth et al., 2007; Van Gestel, 2015 Shape Craeghs et al., 2011; Berumen et al., 2010; Van Gestel, 2015; Kruth et al., 2007 Doubenskaia et al., 2015 Temperature intens”
- Mitigation of lack of fusion defects in powder bed fusion additive manufacturing (2018, background): “The dimensions do not change significantly after the 2 hatch and the layer where the temperature field reaches steady state [24,29,30].”
- On the use of spatter signature for in-situ monitoring of Laser Powder Bed Fusion (2017, unknown): “Process signature Literature in LPBF Melt pool (size, shape, temperature) [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] Track along the scan path (geometry, temperature) [20] [17] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] Slice (surface pattern, geometry, thickness, temperature) [27] [28] [29] [”
- Temperature profile and imaging analysis of laser additive manufacturing of stainless steel (2013, unknown): “[12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17]”