WHO Classification of Tumours of the Digestive System

By F. Bosman. 2010

5,239 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Real-Time Use of Artificial Intelligence in Identification of Diminutive Polyps During Colonoscopy (2018, methodology): “Pathology Pathologists blinded to the optical diagnosis classified the specimens according to the World Health Organization Classification of Tumours, 4th edition (12).”
A common classification framework for neuroendocrine neoplasms: an International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and World Health Organization (WHO) expert consensus proposal (2018, unknown): “In the gastrointestinal tract, the classification of NENs has not been updated by WHO since 2010 [14], though this is now in progress.”
Epidemiology of Gastric Cancer (2015, methodology): “Other widely used classifications include that of the World Health Organization (WHO) [9] and the one proposed by the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association [22].”
The Pathologic Classification of Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Review of Nomenclature, Grading, and Staging Systems (2010, methodology): “Because of these limitations, the most recent WHO classification that applies to all gastroenteropancreatic NET has abandoned the hybrid classification system in favor of separately grading and staging the tumors (Tables 3 and 4).(3) This will bring the WHO system more closely in line with other wid”
The gastric precancerous cascade (2012, background): “In addition, on the basis of quantitative morphometric analyses, it has been observed that type III IM may be classified as lowgrade dysplasia [57].”