Determinants of whole‐plant light requirements in Bornean rain forest tree saplings

By Jennifer L. Baltzer, Sean Thomas. 2007

146 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/55df752d327ed27c20e2650b7781e81ccf7df0eb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Global and Planetary Change

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

A greater range of shade‐tolerance niches in nutrient‐rich forests: an explanation for positive richness–productivity relationships? (2009, background): “…had no consistent effect on shade tolerance – defined as the x-intercept of the relationship between growth and incident light – but species associated with nutrient-poor sites were less shade-tolerant than those from better soils in phylogenetically controlled comparisons (Baltzer & Thomas 2007a).”
Influence of four major plant traits on average height, leaf‐area cover, net primary productivity, and biomass density in single‐species forests: a theoretical investigation (2011, background): “In the model, leaf strategy influenced LAI by altering plant light requirement (Givnish 1988; Baltzer & Thomas 2007).”
Root nutrient concentration and biomass allocation are more plastic than morphological traits in response to nutrient limitation (2017, background): “…as RGR ¼ ln d f 2 H f −ln di2 Hi t where ln denotes the natural logarithm,Df andDi denote final and initial stem diameter, respectively, Hf and Hi denote final and initial height, respectively, and t denotes time in days between the initial and final growth measurements (Baltzer and Thomas 2007).”
The world‐wide ‘fast–slow’ plant economics spectrum: a traits manifesto (2014, background): “Such savings allow plants to either tolerate lowresource conditions, eventually draw down resources to levels competitors cannot tolerate, or both (Tilman & Wedin 1991; Baltzer & Thomas 2007a; Dybzinski et al. 2011).”