Economics of Cropping Systems Featuring Different Rotations, Tillage, and Management

By T. Katsvairo, W. Cox. 2000

54 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Tillage and Crop Rotation Effects on Corn Agronomic Response and Economic Return at Seven Iowa Locations (2015, unknown): “Also, confidence in adopting a new management practice would be improved if economic benefits are coupled with both agronomic and environmental benefits (Vyn et al., 2000; Katsvairo and Cox, 2000; Vetsch et al., 2007; Stanger et al., 2008).”
Managing Inputs for Peak Production (2016, background): “In New York, Katsvairo and Cox (2000) found that a soybean--corn rotation 42 resulted in greater net returns and reduced fertilizer, herbicide, and pesticide use compared to a continuous corn system.”
Integrated Crop-Livestock Systems in the U.S. Corn Belt (2007, background): “…a shortterm sod crop such as red clover (Trifolium pratense L.) into grain cropping systems resulted in positive effects on cash crop yield and profitability under different tillage and chemical management systems (Katsvairo et al., 2003; Katsvairo and Cox, 2000a, 2000b; Singer and Cox, 1998).”