Inductive transfer with context-sensitive neural networks
By Daniel L. Silver, Ryan Poirier, Duane Currie. 2008
58 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Jie Lu
- Shimon Whiteson
- Vitaly Kurin
- Katja Hofmann
- Qiang Yang
- Guangquan Zhang
- Christiane Lemke
- Bogdan Gabrys
Citations in the corpus
- A Survey on Multi-Task Learning (2017, neutral): “[9] propose a context-sensitive multi-task”
- Machine Lifelong Learning: Challenges and Benefits for Artificial General Intelligence (2011, background): “Since 1995, Silver et al. have proposed several variants of sequential learning and consolidation systems using standard back-propagation neural networks [9, 10 ].”
- Fast Context Adaptation via Meta-Learning (2018, methodology): “Silver et al. (2008) proposed context features as a component of inductive transfer, using a predefined one-hot encoded task-specifying context as input to the network.”
- Transfer learning using computational intelligence: A survey (2015, methodology): “To verify the effectiveness of csMTL, a set of experiments was designed to detect csMTL and MTL neural networks in their ability to transfer knowledge [59].”
- Metalearning: a survey of trends and technologies (2013, background): “Bagging however does not satisfy point 2 of Definition 1, as consecutive random samples from the original dataset are independent from each other, so there is no experience from previous learning episodes involved.”
- Lifelong Machine Learning Systems: Beyond Learning Algorithms (2013, background): “Since 1995, Silver et al. have proposed variants of sequential learning and consolidation systems using standard back-propagation neural networks (Silver and Poirier 2004; Silver, Poirier, and Currie 2008).”