Clusters of innovation : regional foundations of U.S. competitiveness
By Michael E. Porter. 2001
152 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/55d9adffcb27a373252b990d12bd116ba86b9b86
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- H. Bathelt
- A. Malmberg
- D. Power
- M. Storper
- Anthony J. Venables
- Sylvia Schwaag-Serger
- Thomas Andersson
- A. Rodríguez‐Pose
Citations in the corpus
- Buzz: face-to-face contact and the urban economy (2004, background): “Other researchers, using more conservative measures, still find that 30% of the US workforce is accounted for by localized employment clusters (Porter, 2001).”
- The Cluster Policies Whitebook (2004, background): “Figure 12: Timeline of the four phases in clustering Source: Waelbroeck-Rocha (2003)61 When does a proper cluster initiative set in?”
- Entrepreneurship and Development: The Role of Clusters (2004, methodology): “Porter’s theory of competitiveness (Porter, 1990, 1998, 2001) and Krugman’s new economic geography (Krugman, 1991) fall into the economic stream.”
- (How) Do (Firms in) Clusters Create Knowledge? (2005, background): “Hypothesis 2: Knowledge in Clusters is Created through Increased Competition and Intensified Rivalry Porter (1990, 1998, 2001) has repeatedly claimed that rivalry is an essential part of cluster dynamics.”