Comparative genome sequence analysis underscores mycoparasitism as the ancestral life style of Trichoderma

By C. Kubicek, A. Herrera-Estrella, V. Seidl‐Seiboth, Diego Martínez, Irina S Druzhinina, M. Thon, S. Zeilinger, S. Casas‐Flores, B. Horwitz, P. Mukherjee and 54 more. Genome Biology, 2011

682 citations recorded by the source corpus.

BackgroundMycoparasitism, a lifestyle where one fungus is parasitic on another fungus, has special relevance when the prey is a plant pathogen, providing a strategy for biological control of pests for plant protection. Probably, the most studied biocontrol agents are species of the genus Hypocrea/Trichoderma.ResultsHere we report an analysis of the genome sequences of the two biocontrol species Trichoderma atroviride (teleomorph Hypocrea atroviridis) and Trichoderma virens (formerly Gliocladium virens, teleomorph Hypocrea virens), and a comparison with Trichoderma reesei (teleomorph Hypocrea jecorina). These three Trichoderma species display a remarkable conservation of gene order (78 to 96%), and a lack of active mobile elements probably due to repeat-induced point mutation. Several gene families are expanded in the two mycoparasitic species relative to T. reesei or other ascomycetes, and are overrepresented in non-syntenic genome regions. A phylogenetic analysis shows that T. reesei and T. virens are derived relative to T. atroviride. The mycoparasitism-specific genes thus arose in a common Trichoderma ancestor but were subsequently lost in T. reesei.ConclusionsThe data offer a better understanding of mycoparasitism, and thus enforce the development of improved biocontrol strains for efficient and environmentally friendly protection of plants.

Subfields: Molecular Biology, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/55d661437f4eafd8bf8f9e1e8aadcb4935bfa4f8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Molecular Biology

  1. M. Schmoll
  2. André Schuster
  3. Francis Martin
  4. Dhananjaya P. Singh
  5. Igor V. Grigoriev
  6. Thomas W. Jeffries
  7. Ratna Prabha
  8. Harkesh B. Singh

In Plant Science

  1. M. Schmoll
  2. André Schuster
  3. Irina S Druzhinina
  4. A. Herrera-Estrella
  5. E. Monte
  6. L. Błaszczyk
  7. K. Sobieralski
  8. Francis Martin

Citations in the corpus