A comparison between different chlorophyll content meters under nutrient deficiency conditions

By Hazem M. Kalaji, P. Dąbrowski, Magdalena D. Cetner, I. Samborska, Izabela Łukasik, Marian Brestic, M. Živčák, Horaczek Tomasz, J. Mojski, H. Kociel and 1 more. 2017

114 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/55cb88e1b09582e5a1b42a3a12931cd004bd9d3e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. R. Ontiveros-Capurata
2. I. Alia-Tejacal
3. Gelacio Alejo-Santiago
4. M. Sandoval-Villa
5. Rodrigo Omar Mendoza-Tafolla
6. P. Juárez-López

Citations in the corpus

• Estimating Nitrogen and Chlorophyll Status of Romaine Lettuce Using SPAD and at LEAF Readings (2019, background): “Current destructive methods for the determination of N and Chl are precise, but time-consuming and relatively expensive (Kalaji et al., 2017).”
• Response of Chlorophyll, Carotenoid and SPAD-502 Measurement to Salinity and Nutrient Stress in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) (2017, unknown): “[119] under nutrient-deficient conditions.”