A constrained theory of magnetoelasticity
By Antonio DeSimone, Richard D. James. 2002
229 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Materials Chemistry
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/55ca1572aac2c097d8b4e3c9de60f544d7d8b276
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
In Materials Chemistry
- Dimitris C. Lagoudas
- B. Kiefer
- Christian Lexcellent
- Irene Arias
- A. Abdollahi
- L.P Liu
- Darren J. Hartl
- Peter Popov
Citations in the corpus
- Shape-Memory Alloys Handbook (2013, background): “DeSimone and James [DES 02] extend the theory of micromagnetism, used for purely magnetic and magnetostrictive cases, to MSMAs.”
- Solutions to the Eshelby conjectures (2008, methodology): “The uniformity of the induced field can also be used to solve the minimization problems that arise in the theories of ferroelectric and magnetostrictive materials (Bhattacharya & Li 2001; DeSimone & James 2002; Liu et al. 2006).”
- Phase-field modeling of crack propagation in piezoelectric and ferroelectric materials with different electromechanical crack conditions (2012, methodology): “Related models have also been developed in micromagnetics (DeSimone et al., 2001; DeSimone and James, 2002).”
- Magnetic field-induced martensitic variant reorientation in magnetic shape memory alloys (2005, methodology): “The model presented by James and Wuttig (1998) is based on a constrained theory of micromagnetics (see also DeSimone and James (1997, 2002, 2003) ).”
- On finitely strained magnetorheological elastomers (2004, background): “Among these recent publications in continuum magnetoelasticity we cite the work of James and Kinderlehrer (1993), DeSimone and Podio-Guidugli (1996), DeSimone and James (2002) and James (2002).”
- Reversible magneto-elastic behavior : A multiscale approach (2008, background): “Several authors have developed some magnetoelastic simulations that take into account uniaxial or cubic crystalline symmetries (for example He, 1999; DeSimone and James, 2002).”