Psychometric properties of an empowerment scale: Testing cognitive, emotional, and behavioral domains

By P. Speer, N. Peterson. 2000

212 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Public Administration

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/55aa1cd4b8a1f860cc901e225390704c4be4ef74

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

1. N. Peterson
2. J. Hughey
3. John E. Schneider
4. Theresa L Armstead
5. Megan A. Sheffer
6. P. Speer
7. C. J. Park
8. Luke J. Rapa

In Public Administration

1. N. Peterson
2. P. Speer

Citations in the corpus

• Community organizations and sense of community: further development in theory and measurement (2008, methodology): “Based on previous work, we expected the new COSOC to be positively associated with psychological empowerment (Itzhaky & York, 2000; Long & Perkins, 2003), participation in community action activities (Speer & Peterson, 2000), and organizational involvement (Speer, 2000).”
• Development and Validation of the Critical Consciousness Scale (2017, background): “…& Abdul-Adil, 1999; Watts & Flanagan, 2007), Ginwright’s social justice youth development theory (SJYD; Ginwright & James, 2002), empowerment theory (Speer & Peterson, 2000), and Zimmerman’s notion of sociopolitical control (Zimmerman, RamírezValles, & Maton, 1999; Zimmerman & Zahniser, 1991),…”
• Defining and operationalizing the phenomena of recovery: a working definition from the recovery science research collaborative (2019, background): “Basic guidelines of the recovery paradigm in behavioral health involve a sense of belongingness, community, empowerment, and a sense of agency (Sherer et al. 1982; Speer and Peterson 2000).”