Single Paper Meta-Analysis: Benefits For Study Summary, Theory-Testing, and Replicability

By Blakeley B. McShane, Ulf Böckenholt. 2017

396 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/559fa62ce42f4f7bc0ab5367eaf922c14c8650a9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

The Teasing Effect: An Underappreciated Benefit of Creating and Resolving an Uncertainty (2018, methodology): “To test the reliability of the teasing effect, we conducted a single-paper meta-analysis (SPM; McShane and Böckenholt 2017) including all the studies except Study 6, which did not measure hedonic experience.”
Three ways to make replication mainstream (2017, background): “dies when they are not (van Erp, et al., 2017; Stanley et al., 2017). Importantly, they can also account for differences in methods factors such as dependent variables, moderators, and study designs (McShane and Bockenholt, 2017a, 2017b) and for varying treatment effects (Gelman, 2015) thereby allow”
Abandon Statistical Significance (2017, background): “, 2018; forthcoming), and social psychology and consumer behavior (McShane and Böckenholt, 2017) .”
Large-Scale Replication Projects in Contemporary Psychological Research (2017, background): “…heterogeneity exists but is ignored, the Type I error of the single study significance tests on which these 36% and 97% figures are based is inflated above the nominal size α and standard sample size and power formulas overstate power and thus understate Type II error (McShane and Böckenholt 2017).”
Service Robots Rising: How Humanoid Robots Influence Service Experiences and Elicit Compensatory Consumer Responses (2019, methodology): “…overall validity of H1 (that consumers served by an HSR versus a human will engage in compensatory consumption), we performed a single paper meta-analysis (SPM; McShane and Böckenholt 2017) on the five studies that included continuous dependent variables, all of which involved food (Studies 1c–4).”