Phylogeny and Conservation

By Andy Purvis, J. L. Gittleman, T. Brooks. 2009

195 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Genetics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/559b32e159366b4660803eb1bffb4a09842280ff

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

1. Marc W. Cadotte
2. T. Jonathan Davies
3. Caroline M. Tucker

In Genetics

1. Marc W. Cadotte
2. T. Jonathan Davies
3. J. Avise

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Marc W. Cadotte
2. T. Jonathan Davies
3. J. Avise
4. Aaron M. Ellison
5. R. P. Anderson
6. Jorge Soberón
7. Caroline M. Tucker
8. Jonathan M. Chase

Citations in the corpus

• Perspective: conservation genetics enters the genomics era (2010, background): “To the extent that phylogenetic assessments should contribute to conservation planning (arguments for and against can be found in Purvis et al. 2005), then phylogenomics might play an expanding role in conservation genetics.”
• Rarest of the rare: advances in combining evolutionary distinctiveness and scarcity to inform conservation at biogeographical scales (2010, background): “While the theoretical justification for including information on species evolutionary histories in conservation has been made strongly (Vane-Wright et al., 1991; Faith, 1992; Crozier, 1997; Mace et al., 2003; Purvis et al., 2005), data on evolutionary relationships have frequently been lacking.”