Storing quantum information for 30 seconds in a nanoelectronic device.
By J. Muhonen, Juan Pablo Dehollain, A. Laucht, Fay Hudson, R. Kalra, T. Sekiguchi, Kohei M. Itoh, D. Jamieson, J. McCallum, Andrew Dzurak and 1 more. Nature Nanotechnology, 2014
624 citations recorded by the source corpus.
The spin of an electron or a nucleus in a semiconductor naturally implements the unit of quantum information--the qubit. In addition, because semiconductors are currently used in the electronics industry, developing qubits in semiconductors would be a promising route to realize scalable quantum information devices. The solid-state environment, however, may provide deleterious interactions between the qubit and the nuclear spins of surrounding atoms, or charge and spin fluctuations arising from defects in oxides and interfaces. For materials such as silicon, enrichment of the spin-zero (28)Si isotope drastically reduces spin-bath decoherence. Experiments on bulk spin ensembles in (28)Si crystals have indeed demonstrated extraordinary coherence times. However, it remained unclear whether these would persist at the single-spin level, in gated nanostructures near amorphous interfaces. Here, we present the coherent operation of individual (31)P electron and nuclear spin qubits in a top-gated nanostructure, fabricated on an isotopically engineered (28)Si substrate. The (31)P nuclear spin sets the new benchmark coherence time (>30 s with Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill (CPMG) sequence) of any single qubit in the solid state and reaches >99.99% control fidelity. The electron spin CPMG coherence time exceeds 0.5 s, and detailed noise spectroscopy indicates that--contrary to widespread belief--it is not limited by the proximity to an interface. Instead, decoherence is probably dominated by thermal and magnetic noise external to the device, and is thus amenable to further improvement.
Subfields: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Materials Chemistry
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/558f5420597d69abb302dd4276354f911f3cb293
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Kohei M. Itoh
- Donovan Buterakos
- A. Morello
- Göran Wendin
- J. C. Hwang
- Kamer Vishi
- Andrew Dzurak
- C. Yang
In Electrical and Electronic Engineering
In Materials Chemistry
Citations in the corpus
- An addressable quantum dot qubit with fault-tolerant control-fidelity. (2014, background): “A recent experiment[29] on a phosphorus donor qubit in (28)Si found out that T 2 is limited by Johnson-Nyquist thermal noise delivered via the onchip ESR line, which is also the likely scenario for the quantum dot qubit given the comparable coherence times.”
- A two-qubit logic gate in silicon (2014, background): “Strong effort across several fields have led to an impressive array of qubit realizations, including trapped ions [4], superconducting circuits [5], single photons[3], single defects or atoms in diamond [6, 7] and silicon [8], and semiconductor quantum dots [4], all with single qubit fidelities exce”
- Materials challenges and opportunities for quantum computing hardware (2021, background): “Although we focus on gate-defined quantum dots, other technologies based on semiconductors, such as shallow donor quantum dot devices (26, 156), generally follow similar fabrication procedures.”