Property rights, collective action and technologies for natural resource management: a conceptual framework

232 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Gender and property rights in the commons: Examples of water rights in South Asia (2001, background): “McCulloch et al. (1998) identify three criteria for security of tenure over common property:”
ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH ON POVERTY USING THE SUSTAINABLE LIVELIHOODS FRAMEWORK (2002, background): “…natural resource management practices, including integrated pest management, community nurseries, rangeland management, irrigation, forestry, and watershed management fall into the category of technologies that are facilitated by collective action (Knox McCulloch, Meinzen-Dick, and Hazell 1998).”
Engendering Agricultural Research, Development, and Extension (2012, methodology): “The following discussion draws heavily from Knox and Meinzen-Dick (1999) but adopts a more gender-focused perspective as in Quisumbing and Pandolfelli (2010).”
IS THERE A FUTURE FOR SMALL FARMS (2005, background): “Government policy needs to support local management by such user groups, while at the same time ensuring that poor people are adequately represented in their management (Knox et al, 2002; Otsuka and Place, 2002).”