Neonicotinoid clothianidin adversely affects insect immunity and promotes replication of a viral pathogen in honey bees
By G. Di Prisco, V. Cavaliere, Desiderato Annoscia, P. Varricchio, E. Caprio, F. Nazzi, G. Gargiulo, F. Pennacchio. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013
653 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/555ee5acab2fa9bd0280b8dd38ad01c453521d23
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Pesticide Residues and Bees – A Risk Assessment (2014, background): “It should also be noted that sublethal and side-effects of neonicotinoids, such as immune suppression [99], have not been taken into account in our assessment.”
- Measuring the economic value of pollination services: principles, evidence and knowledge gaps. (2015, background): “…such as neonicotinoids have significant nonlethal effects on both wild and managed bees, leading to reductions in foraging performance, decreased navigational abilities, reduced fecundity, and increased susceptibility to disease (e.g. Whitehorn et al., 2012; Di Prisco et al., 2013; Goulson, 2013).”
- Effects of neonicotinoids and fipronil on non-target invertebrates (2014, positive): “Di Prisco et al. (2013) demonstrated that clothianidin negatively modulates nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κ B, a protein involved in DNA transcription) immune signaling in insects and adversely affects honeybee antiviral defences controlled by this transcription…”
- The dose makes the poison: have “field realistic” rates of exposure of bees to neonicotinoid insecticides been overestimated in laboratory studies? (2014, background): “This problem is compounded by the fact that a single dose rate is often used, rather than the normal toxicological procedure of determining effects over a range of doses to generate a response curve (e.g. di Prisco et al., 2013; Laycock et al., 2014).”
- Population dynamics of European honey bee genotypes under different environmental conditions (2014, background): “…2010; Johnson et al., 2009; Genersch et al., 2010; Nazzi et al., 2013; Neumann and Carreck, 2010), the use of pesticides (Desneux et al., 2007; Di Prisco et al., 2013; Hatjina et al., 2013; Nguyen et al., 2009; Frazier et al., 2008; vanEngelsdorp et al., 2009; Chauzat et al., 2009) and changes…”
- The carry‐over effects of pollen shortage decrease the survival of honeybee colonies in farmlands (2017, background): “Pollen shortage may also encourage additional opportunistic parasites and pathogens (Alaux et al. 2010) and increase the sensitivity of bees to pesticides (di Prisco et al. 2013).”
- Mitigating the anthropogenic spread of bee parasites to protect wild pollinators (2015, background): “For example, Di Prisco et al. (2013) recently showed that exposure to neonicotinoids (clothianidin or imidacloprid) leads to immunosuppression in honey bees, which, in turn, promotes the replication of the deformed wing virus in insects bearing covert infections.”
- Bee declines driven by combined stress from parasites, pesticides, and lack of flowers (2015, background): “(126) recently showed that exposure to neonicotinoids (clothianidin or imidacloprid) leads to immuno-”