The Future of the Capitalist State

By B. Jessop. 2002

1,148 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5553c2b10cefe63b65fc06fc802c3cc1c12d65f3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Networked Governance or Just Networks? Local Governance of the Knowledge Economy in Limerick (Ireland) and Karlskrona (Sweden) (2007, background): “Accounts of the transition from government to governance suggest that the rescaling (from national to local) and reframing (through the incorporation of non-state actors) of economic governance is a function of the evolving role of the state in the knowledge economy, which is to facilitate the condi”
Decoding Urban Land Governance: State Reconstruction in Contemporary Chinese Cities (2009, background): “This regulating state 'comprises an ensemble of socially embedded, socially regularized and strategically selective institutions, organizations, social forces and actions organized around (or at least involved in) the expanded reproduction of capital as a social relation' (Jessop, 2002: 5).”
The financialization of a social housing provider (2015, background): “The growing financial constraints that resulted from the “hollowing out” of the state (Jessop, 2002), left atomized public entities, outside the protective shelter of the state, that were receptive to the solutions that financial intermediaries advocated.”
Advancing Evolutionary Economic Geography by Engaged Pluralism (2014, background): “A positive result of this emphasis is that authors working under the GPE or similar frameworks, such as regulation theory, have often been among the first to highlight the continued relevance of the nation-state (JESSOP, 2002; MACKINNON et al., 2009).”
Cultural political economy: On making the cultural turn without falling into soft economic sociology (2008, background): “…economic practices and formations (GibsonGraham 1996); (3) productivism or the assumption that production is the essence of economies and therefore, the fundamental; or even the only real source of value, has to be replaced by a recognition of the dispersion and contingency of value; and finally…”
Beyond institutional fetishism: From the developmental to the regulatory state (2005, methodology): “This essay contends that we need to replace this framework with a conceptualisation of states and their associated strategic capacities as products of social and political relationships both inside and outside the state.(7) Adopting this view of the state highlights the process of state transformati”
Competing hegemons? Chinese versus American geo-economic strategies in Africa (2007, background): “14 ‘‘In general terms, the law of value suggests that more time will be spent on producing commodities whose market price is above their price of production’’ (Jessop, 2002:17).”
The determinants of income inequality in OECD countries (2018, background): “For more details on the periodisation of Fordism and post-Fordism, see Jessop (2002).”
Devolution, constitutional change and economic development: Explaining and understanding the new institutional geographies of the British state (2005, background): “This is important, because forcontinuing roles played by the state and political strategy in the production of new sites and scales of economic Jessop (2002), the weakening of the primacy of the national scale of state activity is ‘related to the ‘‘hollow-governance.”