Barking in domestic dogs: context specificity and individual identification

237 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Vocal Expression of Emotions in Mammals: Mechanisms of Production and Evidence (2012, background): “…(2011) 14 Dog Canis familiaris V E/D E Growls and barks 1, 3, 5, 21, 23 Taylor et al. (2009) 15 A/V E E Barks 1, 3, 12, 13, 16, 17, 18, 20, 21, 26 Yin & McCowan (2004) 16 Mongoose Suricat suricatta A E E/O Alarm vocalizations 1, 2, 3, 15, 16, 17, 18, 20, 21, 24 Manser (2001) 17 Silver fox Vulpes…”
‘The bone is mine’: affective and referential aspects of dog growls (2010, background): “However, this particular function of communicative interaction has not previously been found in canids.”
The contribution of source–filter theory to mammal vocal communication research (2010, background): “It was confirmed that barks could be statistically divided into different context-specific subsets on the basis of the co-variation of their peak, mean fundamental frequency, duration and inter-bark interval (Yin & McCowan, 2004).”
Size Communication in domestic dog (Canis familiaris) growls. (2010, unknown): “Recordings were made in a standardized context in which A.M.T. entered the dog’s home to trigger a territorial vocal response (similar methods have been used in previous dog vocal communication studies: Yin & McCowan 2004; Pongrácz et al. 2005; Taylor et al. 2008).”