Do libertarians dream of electric coins? The material embeddedness of Bitcoin
By Henrik Karlstrøm. 2014
116 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Finance, Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/554f7c3ca844ec24781ae65a61c117b6cfb54c10
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Finance
In Information Systems
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- The Social Life of Bitcoin (2018, background): “Bitcoin aims at both forms of disintermediation (Karlstrøm, 2014: 28), and it is the promise of both that accounts for a substantial amount of its political appeal.”
- How is Bitcoin Money? (2016, background): “Furthermore, Bitcoin seem to be underpinned by an ideological superstructure heavily informed by monetarist and libertarian critiques of the conventional money system (Karlstrøm, 2014).”
- Why do businesses go crypto? An empirical analysis of initial coin offerings (2018, unknown): “…to analyze the political economy of the phenomenon (Ametrano, 2016; Bjerg, 2015; Böhme, Christin, Edelman, & Moore, 2015; Dwyer, 2015; Ennis, 2016; Karlstrøm, 2014; Lo & Wang, 2014) and explore its impact on traditional market failures stemming from information asymmetry and moral hazard…”
- Price Fluctuations and the Use of Bitcoin: An Empirical Inquiry (2015, unknown): “As noted by Karlstrøm [81] common features of cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin are: (1) the money supply is controlled by an algorithm, the workings of which are in the public domain, and which is independent of central bank monetary policy; (2) verification of transactions is decentralized and nonhier”