The Rasch Model Explained

By D. Andrich. 2005

82 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5513efc89388d03d3c554054a9e0e8d4f71703d6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Networks and Communications

1. Mark R. Wilson
2. Stephen M. Humphry
3. I. Marais
4. R. Adams
5. Margaret Wu
6. D. Andrich
7. Mark R. Wilson

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Mark R. Wilson
2. R. Adams
3. Margaret Wu

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Mark R. Wilson
2. Stephen M. Humphry
3. I. Marais
4. R. Adams
5. Margaret Wu
6. D. Andrich
7. Julie Lorah
8. Mark R. Wilson

Citations in the corpus

• The Rasch Rating Model and the Disordered Threshold Controversy (2012, methodology): “(Andrich, 2005, p. 323) he demonstrates nothing in the move from the model defined by (8) to (11) to the model defined by (12) to (14) that requires the ordering of the tau parameters, nor connects the ordering of the tau values to the ordering of the categories.”
• Quantifying Local, Response Dependence Between Two Polytomous Items Using the Rasch Model (2012, background): “It is observed from Figure 1, and it can be proved, that the range in which the probability of the response x is the greatest of the response probabilities is bounded by the adjacent thresholds dx 1 and dx (Andrich, 2005).”
• An Expanded Derivation of the Threshold Structure of the Polytomous Rasch Model That Dispels Any “Threshold Disorder Controversy” (2013, background): “Because of continuing misunderstandings in AWW, this motivation, which was introduced in Andrich (1978) and elaborated in Andrich (2005, 2010), is expanded further.”