Estimating Changing Extremes Using Empirical Ranking Methods

By C. Folland, C. Anderson. 2002

65 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Comparison of ensemble‐MOS methods in the Lorenz '96 setting (2006, background): “The concept of the sampling distribution for an estimated cumulative probability is somewhat abstract, but is nicely illustrated in Folland & Anderson (2002).”
Bringing Closure to the Plotting Position Controversy (2008, methodology): “Also, conclusion 3 is often seen as a viable option (e.g., Castillo, 1988) and was recently promoted by Folland and Anderson (2002).”
Postprocessing of Ensemble Precipitation Predictions with Extended Logistic Regression Based on Hindcasts (2012, unknown): “Other probability estimates are discussed in Folland and Anderson (2002). Kernel density estimation (e.”
On “Field Significance” and the False Discovery Rate (2006, background): “…hypothesis tests for which all null hypotheses are true) follows a beta distribution (e.g., Wilks 2006) whose first parameter is 1 and whose second parameter is K. Folland and Anderson (2002) show examples of these beta distributions, using a somewhat different notation than that adopted here.”
Plotting Positions in Extreme Value Analysis (2006, background): “result by Harris (1996) is available].”