Biased Embryos and Evolution: Acknowledgements
By W. Arthur. 2004
142 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: History and Philosophy of Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/550efdceb260ecb86e3467977e859a9596e7716f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In History and Philosophy of Science
- Kevin N. Laland
- Kim Sterelny
- Daniel J. Nicholson
- Gerd B. Müller
- C. Klingenberg
- Eva Jablonka
- Erle C. Ellis
Citations in the corpus
- The Return of the Organism as a Fundamental Explanatory Concept in Biology (2014, background): “Instead, the dynamics of organismic development must be regarded as playing a decisive role in biasing the direction of evolution (Arthur 2004).”
- The extended evolutionary synthesis: its structure, assumptions and predictions (2015, background): “well integrated) and can promote functionality in novel environments [25,27,28], result in bias being, at least potentially, probabilistically predictable.”
- Morphological Integration and Developmental Modularity (2008, background): “The genetic covariance structure can manifest itself as genetic constraints (Cheverud 1984) or developmental biases (Arthur 2004), which are properties of the genetic variation that limit the potential response to selection in certain directions of phenotypic space or deflect the response to…”