Intrusion Detection Systems: A Survey and Taxonomy
By Stefan Axelsson. 2002
1,039 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/550aec01bf61ff9fd271debc394a8c3dfa59657b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Manuel Günther
- Andras Rozsa
- Ansam Khraisat
- Terrance E. Boult
- Ethan M. Rudd
- Ammar Alazab
- Animesh Patcha
- Nour Moustafa
Citations in the corpus
- UNSW-NB15: a comprehensive data set for network intrusion detection systems (UNSW-NB15 network data set) (2015, background): “However, in the anomaly based, a normal profile is created from the normal behavior of the network, and any deviation from this is considered as attack [3] [4].”
- An Overview of IP Flow-Based Intrusion Detection (2010, methodology): “At the second stage, packet inspection can be used to additionally protect critical servers or selected systems, for which the rst stage has discovered suspicious activities.”
- Immune system approaches to intrusion detection – a review (2004, methodology): “Here we focus on two ways: the analysis approach and the placement of the IDS, although there have been recent work [10, 35] on alternative taxonomies.”
- A critical review of intrusion detection systems in the internet of things: techniques, deployment strategy, validation strategy, attacks, public datasets and challenges (2021, methodology): “The survey on intrusion detection systems and taxonomy by Axelsson (Axelsson, 2000) classified intrusion detection systems based on the detection methods.”
- A survey of attacks and detection mechanisms on intelligent transportation systems: VANETs and IoV (2017, background): “While some approaches have response mechanism to detected attacks, they are mainly passive responses such as raising alarms, or active attacks that seek control over the attacked system [91] such as isolation of nodes and dropping malicious packets.”
- An overview of anomaly detection techniques: Existing solutions and latest technological trends (2007, methodology): “For a detailed exposition of techniques proposed before 2000, the reader is directed to the survey by Axelsson [6].”
- A taxonomy of DDoS attack and DDoS defense mechanisms (2004, background): “Examples of system security mechanisms include monitored access to the machine [71], applications that download and install security patches, firewall systems [49], intrusion detection systems [6], and worm defense systems [73].”
- The role of communication systems in smart grids: Architectures, technical solutions and research challenges (2013, methodology): “There are different approaches that can be applied to design intrusion detection techniques, but at least three major methodologies can be identified [323]:”
- Naive Bayes vs decision trees in intrusion detection systems (2004, background): “There are two general approaches to intrusion detection [1]: Anomaly detection: The idea is that each user has a certain profile within the system that will not be changed a lot in time.”
- Intrusion detection system: A comprehensive review (2013, background): “Pattern Matching (Debar et al., 1999; Axelsson, 2000; Krugel and Toth, 2000; Debar et al., 2000; Murali and Rao, 2005; Sabahi and Movaghar, 2008; Lazarevic et al., 2005; Kartit et al., 2012) –”
- A Survey of Stealth Malware Attacks, Mitigation Measures, and Steps Toward Autonomous Open World Solutions (2016, background): “, [5]–[7], some specifically discussing machine learning intrusion detection techniques [1], [8]–[10].”
- Taxonomy and Survey of Collaborative Intrusion Detection (2015, background): “1999; Axelsson 2000; Chandola et al. 2009; Barry and Chan 2010], only a few focus specifically on CIDSs and their architecture [Bye et al. 2010; Zhou et al. 2010]. In particular, Zhou et al. [2010] presented a study of CIDSs and focused mainly on the system architectures and the correlation of alert”
- Network intrusion detection system: A systematic study of machine learning and deep learning approaches (2020, background): “25,26 The advantage includes the high detection efficiency for the known attacks due to the availability of signature for those attacks.”
- Survey of intrusion detection systems: techniques, datasets and challenges (2019, methodology): “Existing review articles (e.g., such as (Buczak & Guven, 2016; Axelsson, 2000; Ahmed et al., 2016; Lunt, 1988; Agrawal & Agrawal, 2015)) focus on intrusion detection techniques or dataset issue or type of computer attack and IDS evasion.”
- Machine Learning Based Intrusion Detection Systems for IoT Applications (2019, background): “Many solutions for intrusion detection have been proposed in the literature [18, 8, 47, 44, 32, 14] and most of them are dedicated for traditional networking paradigms only, and as far as the literature is concerned, less work has been done towards the development of ML-based intrusion detection…”
- Intrusion detection systems for IoT-based smart environments: a survey (2018, background): “In 2000, Axelsson [45] surveyed 20 research projects on IDSs.”
- Model-Based Attack Detection and Mitigation for Automatic Generation Control (2014, background): “Intrusion detection systems are traditionally classified into signature-based detection and anomaly-based detection [5].”