Interface law for FRP–concrete delamination

250 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Effect of Temperature Variation on the Full-Range Behavior of FRP-to-Concrete Bonded Joints (2012, background): “As a result, many studies have been conducted on the bond behavior of FRP-to-concrete interfaces (e.g. Taljsten 1996; Chajes et al. 1996; Yuan et al. 2000; Brosens 2001; Chen and Teng 2001; De Lorenzis et al. 2001; Nakaba et al. 2001; Wu et al. 2002; Dai et al. 2005, 2006; Lu et al. 2005a, 2005b; Ya”
Matrix–fiber bond behavior in PBO FRCM composites: A fracture mechanics approach (2014, background): “However, the weakness of FRCM–concrete joints appears to be at the matrix–fiber interface [18–23] rather than in the substrate or at the matrix–concrete interface, as is typically observed with FRP composites [24–38].”
Round Robin Test for composite-to-brick shear bond characterization (2012, methodology): “shear stress between two subsequent strain gauges was estimated by Equation 1, and the related slipping by Equation 2 (Taljsten 1997; Ferracuti et al. 2007):”
Analysis of FRP–concrete debonding via boundary integral equations (2008, methodology): “Mode II interface laws are usually obtained from post-processing of experimental results [57,43,66,22].”