Cellulose microfibrils from potato tuber cells: Processing and characterization of starch–cellulose microfibril composites

By A. Dufresne, D. Dupeyre, M. Vignon. 2000

509 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Microfibrillated cellulose and new nanocomposite materials: a review (2010, background): “2004; Habibi and Vignon 2008), potato pulp (Dufresne et al. 2000), swede root (Bruce et al.”
Eco-friendly synthesis, characterization and properties of a sodium carboxymethyl cellulose/graphene oxide nanocomposite film (2013, background): “starch and gelatin have been investigated for film and other material properties (Lourdin et al. 1995; Dufresne et al. 2000).”
Biodegradable Multiphase Systems Based on Plasticized Starch: A Review (2004, background): “Different types of fibers or microfibrils were tested in association with PLS: microfibrils from potato pulp,([52,53]) bleached leafwood fibers, fibers from bleached eucalyptus pulp,([190]) flax and jute fibers.”
The effect of fiber content on the mechanical and thermal expansion properties of biocomposites based on microfibrillated cellulose (2008, background): “Dufresne et al. (2000) studied the reinforcing effect of cellulose microfibrils from potato tuber cells in a matrix of potato starch.”
CELLULOSIC NANOCOMPOSITES: A REVIEW (2008, methodology): “The TEM method is highly regarded for showing features of individual cellulosic nanoelements (Dufresne et al. 2000; Wang and Sain 2007a; Elazzouzi-Hafraoui et al. 2008).”