Data mining for discrimination discovery
By Salvatore Ruggieri, Dino Pedreschi, Franco Turini. 2010
251 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Law, Political Science and International Relations, AI Ethics, Fairness & Society
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Indrė Žliobaitė
- Xintao Wu
- Lu Zhang
- Yongkai Wu
- Sara Hajian
- Silvia Chiappa
- Faisal Kamiran
- Vrushali Kulkarni
In Law
- Sara Hajian
- Xintao Wu
- Salvatore Ruggieri
- Faisal Kamiran
- Yongkai Wu
- Lu Zhang
- Andrea Romei
- Sören Preibusch
In Political Science and International Relations
- Sara Hajian
- Andrea Romei
- Faisal Kamiran
- Salvatore Ruggieri
- Indrė Žliobaitė
- Josep Domingo-Ferrer
- Vrushali Kulkarni
- Asmita Kashid
In AI Ethics, Fairness & Society
- Xintao Wu
- Lu Zhang
- Yongkai Wu
- Indrė Žliobaitė
- Silvia Chiappa
- Sara Hajian
- Francesco Bonchi
- Carlos Castillo
Citations in the corpus
- Causal Modeling-Based Discrimination Discovery and Removal: Criteria, Bounds, and Algorithms (2019, background): “Discrimination discovery and removal from historical data have received increasing attention over the past few years in data science [1], [2], [3], [4], [5].”
- Fairness and Abstraction in Sociotechnical Systems (2019, background): “For example, the earliest fair-ML work by Ruggieri et al. formulates "fairness" as a goal for model optimization [59].”
- A Causal Framework for Discovering and Removing Direct and Indirect Discrimination (2016, background): “Discrimination discovery and removal has received an increasing attention over the past few years in data science (Hajian and Domingo-Ferrer 2013; Kamiran and Calders 2012; Ruggieri, Pedreschi, and Turini 2010; Romei and Ruggieri 2014; Feldman et al. 2015).”
- Achieving Non-Discrimination in Data Release (2016, methodology): “1 INTRODUCTION Discrimination discovery and prevention/removal has been an active research area recently [9, 12, 16, 28, 29, 39].”
- A survey on measuring indirect discrimination in machine learning (2015, background): “…discovery typically mines association and classifi-cation rules from the data, and then assesses those rules in terms of potential discrimination [Ruggieri et al. 2010; Romei et al. 2012; Hajian and Domingo-Ferrer 2013; Pedreschi et al. 2012; Luong et al. 2011; Mancuhan and Clifton 2014].”
- Exposing the probabilistic causal structure of discrimination (2015, methodology): “However, following the approaches of [30,31], and [39], the contingency table shown in Fig.”
- Using Loglinear Model for Discrimination Discovery and Prevention (2016, background): “Various business models have been built around the collection and use of individual data including the above protected attributes to make important decisions like employment, credit, and insurance.”
- Meaningful Explanations of Black Box AI Decision Systems (2019, background): “…as demonstrated in the lively stream of research in discrimination-aware data mining, started by our research group in 2008 (Pedreschi, Ruggieri, and Turini 2008; Ruggieri, Pedreschi, and Turini 2010), but it is unlikely that rules in their simplest form will solve the general explanation problem.”
- Discrimination- and privacy-aware patterns (2015, methodology): “Pedreschi et al. (2008, 2009a, b), Ruggieri et al. (2010) have introduced data mining approaches for discrimination discovery.”
- Causal Discrimination Discovery Through Propensity Score Analysis (2016, methodology): “Earlier studies have primarily relied upon simple statistical analysis involving association or correlation measures [5, 15, 22, 23, 25] However, such analyses can produce misleading conclusions because they largely ignore the effect of confounding variables – variables that cam be used to determine”
- Measuring discrimination in algorithmic decision making (2017, background): “A data mining approach for discrimination discovery typically extracts association and classification rules from data, and then evaluates those rules in terms of potential discrimination [28,39,40,47,49,53,54].”
- A Roadmap for a Rigorous Science of Interpretability (2017, background): “…important criteria such as safety [Otte, 2013, Amodei et al., 2016, Varshney and Alemzadeh, 2016], nondiscrimination [Bostrom and Yudkowsky, 2014, Ruggieri et al., 2010, Hardt et al., 2016], avoiding technical debt [Sculley et al., 2015], or providing the right to explanation [Goodman and…”
- Discrimination Prevention using Privacy Preserving Techniques (2015, background): “PD-classification rule is a classification rule which contains Potentially Discriminatory (PD) item set [2].”