Sharp geometric and functional inequalities in metric measure spaces with lower Ricci curvature bounds

By Fabio Cavalletti, Andrea Mondino. 2015

105 citations recorded by the source corpus.

For metric measure spaces verifying the reduced curvature-dimension condition $CD^*(K,N)$ we prove a series of sharp functional inequalities under the additional assumption of essentially non-branching. Examples of spaces entering this framework are (weighted) Riemannian manifolds satisfying lower Ricci curvature bounds and their measured Gromov Hausdorff limits, Alexandrov spaces satisfying lower curvature bounds and more generally $RCD^*(K,N)$-spaces, Finsler manifolds endowed with a strongly convex norm and satisfying lower Ricci curvature bounds, etc. In particular we prove Brunn-Minkowski inequality, $p$-spectral gap (or equivalently $p$-Poincare inequality) for any $p\in [1,\infty)$, log-Sobolev inequality, Talagrand inequality and finally Sobolev inequality. All the results are proved in a sharp form involving an upper bound on the diameter of the space; if this extra sharpening is suppressed, all the previous inequalities for essentially non-branching $CD^*(K,N)$ spaces take the same form of the corresponding ones holding for a weighted Riemannian manifold verifying curvature-dimension condition $CD(K,N)$ in the sense of Bakry-Emery. In this sense inequalities are sharp. We also discuss the rigidity and almost rigidity statements associated to the $p$-spectral gap. Finally let us mention that for essentially non-branching metric measure spaces, the local curvature-dimension condition $CD_{loc}(K,N)$ is equivalent to the reduced curvature-dimension condition $CD^*(K,N)$. Therefore we also have shown that sharp Brunn-Minkowski inequality in the \emph{global} form can be deduced from the \emph{local} curvature-dimension condition, providing a step towards (the long-standing problem of) globalization for the curvature-dimension condition $CD(K,N)$.

Subfields: Applied Mathematics, Astronomy and Astrophysics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/54a653c4bff052ce885bda436f0eda952b8e5513

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Mathematics

  1. Andrea Mondino
  2. Fabio Cavalletti
  3. Nicola Gigli
  4. Emanuel Milman
  5. Luigi Ambrosio
  6. Elia Brué
  7. Enrico Pasqualetto
  8. Sajjad Lakzian

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Fabio Cavalletti
  2. Andrea Mondino
  3. Nicola Gigli
  4. Luigi Ambrosio
  5. Emanuel Milman
  6. Yu Kitabeppu
  7. Sajjad Lakzian
  8. Zoltán M. Balogh

Citations in the corpus