Non-tuned data intelligent model for soil temperature estimation: A new approach

By Hadi Sanikhani, Ravinesh C. Deo, Zaher Mundher Yaseen, Okan Eray, Ozgur Kisi. Geoderma, 2018

101 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract In knowledge-based decision-support systems, soil temperature (ST) estimation can be considered as the core modeling task used for investigating the dynamics of solar energy exchange between the land surface and the sub-surface soil layers. In addition, the impacts of meteorological processes on energy uptake into the underlying soils and the design of more resilient and sustainable agricultural systems for improved crop health and resource management. In this paper, monthly ST estimation at various soil depths (i.e., 5, 50 and 100 cm) is performed by applying data-intelligent machine learning models: extreme learning machine (ELM), artificial neural network (ANN) and M5 Model Tree (M5 Tree). The predictive models are trained using meteorological information from two stations (i.e., Mersin and Adana, Turkey). The models are constructed using monthly input variables, including air temperature (T-air), windspeed (W), relative humidity (RH), solar radiation (SR), while the objective variable is the soil temperature measurement at 5, 50 and 100 cm depths for the period 1986–2010. Multi-objective performance criteria are applied to diagnose the predictive accuracy of the data-intelligent models, entailing the correlation coefficient (R), root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), Willmott's Index (WI), Nash Sutcliffe's coefficient (Nash) and the Legates & McCabe's Index (LMI). Based on the tested dataset, the ELM model is yielded the most accurate performance for Mersin station compared to the lower performance of ANN and M5 Tree models. For this case, the most accurate performance is attained for the ST estimation at a depth of 50 cm, with the highest value of R = 0.992, WI = 0.999, Nash = 0.981, LMI = 0.879 and the lowest value of the relative RMSE and MAE values (i.e., 4.7 and 4.0%, respectively), attained using T-air, W, RH and periodicity as the predictor variables. The performance results for the Adana station behave differently, where ELM is seen to exceed the ANN and M5 Tree models for ST estimation at the depths of 5 and 100 cm. On the other hand, the ANN model performs marginally better than the ELM and the M5 Tree model at a depth of 50 cm with a different set of input combinations. The assessment of the estimation skills reveals the efficacy of the ELM over the counterpart benchmark models. In accordance with the present results, it is concluded that ELM model can be applied as an ideal decision-support tool for soil temperature estimation at multiple depths, whilst ensuring that an appropriate combination of meteorological inputs is applied to yield an optimal model.

Subfields: Civil and Structural Engineering, Environmental Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/54a5c2769e1347f1a800ad2dcea91053d2804cf0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Civil and Structural Engineering

Ozgur Kisi

In Environmental Engineering

Citations in the corpus

Evaporation modelling by heuristic regression approaches using only temperature data (2019, methodology): “Over the years, the M5Tree model has become a serious alternative to the traditional artificial neural network (ANN) models and has been used in several applications (e.g. Hamze-Ziabari and Bakhshpoori 2018, Li et al. 2018, Ranjbar and Mahjouri 2018, Sanikhani et al. 2018).”