A comparison between the axial flux and the radial flux structures for PM synchronous motors

By Andrea Cavagnino, M. Lazzari, Francesco Profumo, Alberto Tenconi. Conference Record of the 2001 IEEE Industry Applications Conference. 36th IAS Annual Meeting (Cat. No.01CH37248), 2001

408 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Control and Systems Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/549af97685eb5a4b2d82f567a001bcf23f408a4d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Ali Emadi
2. M. Uddin
3. C. Goldstein
4. Mohamed Abdalmagid
5. Nicole-Marie Sa’adeh
6. F. Caricchi
7. A. Parviainen
8. F. G. Capponi

Citations in the corpus

• Design of axial-flux permanent-magnet low-speed machines and performance comparison between radial-flux and axial-flux machines (2005, background): “Cavagnino (Cavagnino et al., 2001) presents a comparison between surface-mounted axial-flux and radial-flux permanent-magnet machines.”
• Recent Advances in Axial-Flux Permanent-Magnet Machine Technology (2012, methodology): “, [73], perform a detailed design comparison between RFPM machines and a Kaman machine intended for”
• A Comprehensive Review of Axial-Flux Permanent-Magnet Machines (2014, background): “Sugimoto et al. [49] developed a high-temperature superconducting (HTS) AFPM synchronous motor at liquid nitrogen temperature.”
• Review of Electric Machines in More-/Hybrid-/Turbo-Electric Aircraft (2021, background): “be high (>8 for the considered radial machines in [131]) as the torque reduction might exceed the mass reduction due to the increased iron losses.”