End-of-life discussions, goal attainment, and distress at the end of life: predictors and outcomes of receipt of care consistent with preferences.
By J. Mack, J. Weeks, A. Wright, S. Block, Holly Gwen Prigerson. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2010
760 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5493870433c2ba4c2ce5bfe0d7601008407a59cd
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Health Professions
In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Citations in the corpus
- 5th ESO-ESMO international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC 5) (2020, background): “Conversations about prognosis, priorities and end-of-life care are vitally important for those affected by advanced cancer and should be part of routine care.(15) Information about prognosis and likely survival time with and without different anticancer treatments is important to enable fully inform”
- Delivering High-Quality Cancer Care: Charting a New Course for a System in Crisis (2014, background): “Patients who discuss advance care planning with their clinicians are more likely to receive end-of-life care that is consistent with their preferences (Detering et al., 2010; Mack et al., 2010; Silveira et al., 2010).”