Genetics and Reproduction of Common (Phragmites australis) and Giant Reed (Arundo donax)
By K. Saltonstall, A. Lambert, L. Meyerson. Invasive Plant Science and Management, 2010
86 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Abstract Genetic diversity and reproductive characteristics may play an important role in the invasion process. Here, we review the genetic structure and reproductive characteristics of common reed and giant reed, two of the most aggressive, large-statured invasive grasses in North America. Common reed reproduces both sexually and asexually and has a complex population structure, characterized by three subspecies with overlapping distributions; of which, one is introduced, one native, and the third is of unknown origins. These three subspecies show varying levels of genetic diversity, with introduced common reed having high levels of nuclear diversity, indicating that multiple introductions have likely occurred. In contrast, giant reed has low genetic diversity and appears to reproduce solely via asexual fragments yet is highly aggressive in parts of its introduced range. Both species are well-adapted for growth in human-dominated landscapes, which is presumably facilitated by their rhizomatous growth habit. Nomenclature: Common reed, Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steudel; giant reed, Arundo donax L
Subfields: Agronomy and Crop Science, Ecology, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5481fa5ce2100469c97276c3b4ebd30b30b5b9f3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Agronomy and Crop Science
In Ecology
In Plant Science
Citations in the corpus
- Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic (3rd edition) (2022, background): “…of an alien species may occur in a region in different stages of the INIC; early in the process, some can be naturalized while others are still casual (e.g. Essl et al. 2009), whereas later on, some can be invasive while others not (e.g. Meyerson et al. 2010a, b, Saltonstall et al. 2010).”