The biological aspects of rare plant conservation
By Barry R. Flamm, H. Synge. Vegetatio, 2004
483 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/544310bc7de94ba37439afc43f8da0d86fb08cfc
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Plant Science
- I. Kühn
- S. Klotz
- Matthias C. Rillig
- A. Helm
- M. Hutchings
- Peter Poschlod
- K. Thompson
- M. V. D. van der Heijden
Citations in the corpus
- How species traits and affinity to urban land use control large‐scale species frequency (2009, background): “This approach may, however, be too simple as species’ distribution ranges are correlated to their niche width and specializations (Rabinowitz, 1981; Ehrlén & Eriksson, 2000).”
- Conservation of Northern European plant diversity: the correspondence with soil pH (2004, background): “According to the work of Rabinowitz (1981), habitat specificity is one criteria of rarity.”
- Additive Partitioning of Species Diversity across Multiple Spatial Scales: Implications for Regional Conservation of Biodiversity (2003, background): “It is unclear whether the rare species in our study are sampling artifacts, biologically meaningful, or truly rare (Rabinowitz 1981; Gaston 1994), but the proportion of singletons we recorded is typical of other canopy insect communities.”
- Size‐dependent flowering and costs of reproduction affect population dynamics in a tuberous perennial woodland orchid (2010, background): “However, because flowering and fruiting patterns in orchids can vary strongly from one year to the next (e.g. Wells 1981; Jacquemyn et al. 2009; Hutchings 2010), possibly related to weather conditions, this adds a strong stochastic component to the analysis of flowering dynamics in orchid species.”
- The indicator side of tree microhabitats: A multi-taxon approach based on bats, birds and saproxylic beetles (2018, background): “In this database, commonness and rarity classes are based on geographic range and local abundance (Rabinowitz, 1981), rare species having a wide range but a consistently low abundance (patrimonial value of 3) or a narrow range and possible high local abundance (patrimonial value of 4).”
- Effect of species rarity on the accuracy of species distribution models for reptiles and amphibians in southern California (2009, background): “However, there are actually several factors that contribute to species rarity (Karl et al ., 2002) including range size, habitat specificity and local density (Rabinowitz, 1981).”
- Effectiveness of Conservation Targets in Capturing Genetic Diversity (2003, background): “When applying these results to other rare species, it is important to remember that rarity encompasses many different combinations of geographic distribution and population size ( Rabinowitz 1981).”