Word Embedding based Generalized Language Model for Information Retrieval
By Debasis Ganguly, Dwaipayan Roy, Mandar Mitra, Gareth J.F. Jones. 2015
268 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Information Retrieval & Search
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Jimmy J. Lin
- Jamie Callan
- Hamed Zamani
- Andrew Yates
- Zhuyun Dai
- Allan Hanbury
- Rodrigo Nogueira
- Sebastian Hofstätter
In Information Systems
- Jimmy J. Lin
- Jamie Callan
- Andrew Yates
- Rodrigo Nogueira
- Hamed Zamani
- Zeynep Akkalyoncu Yilmaz
- Zhuyun Dai
- Nick Craswell
In Information Retrieval & Search
- Jimmy J. Lin
- Andrew Yates
- Jamie Callan
- Rodrigo Nogueira
- Zhuyun Dai
- Allan Hanbury
- Zeynep Akkalyoncu Yilmaz
- Hamed Zamani
Citations in the corpus
- Pretrained Transformers for Text Ranking: BERT and Beyond (2020, methodology): “pre-trained word2vec embeddings [Le and Mikolov, 2014] and computes relevance scores by aggregating cosine similarities across all query–document term pairs. Language models based on word embeddings [Ganguly et al., 2015] can be thought of as conceptually belonging to the class of representation-bas”
- Learning to Match using Local and Distributed Representations of Text for Web Search (2016, methodology): “In IR, a significant number of these works have focused on word embeddings [6, 8, 10, 11, 27, 28, 34, 41] and modelling short-text similarities [15, 16, 29, 35–37].”
- Query Expansion with Locally-Trained Word Embeddings (2016, methodology): “(Ganguly et al., 2015) used the word similarity in the word2vec embedding space as a way to estimate term transformation probabilities in a language modelling setting for retrieval.”
- COIL: Revisit Exact Lexical Match in Information Retrieval with Contextualized Inverted List (2021, methodology): “Early attempts compute similarity between pre-trained word embedding such as word2vec (Mikolov et al., 2013) and GLoVe (Pennington et al., 2014) to produce matching score (Ganguly et al., 2015; Diaz et al., 2016).”
- Cross-Domain Sentence Modeling for Relevance Transfer with BERT (2019, background): “There has also been some effort in learning word embeddings to directly capture relevance matching [74, 21] rather than linguistic features as in word2vec [43] or GloVe [49].”
- Estimating Embedding Vectors for Queries (2016, background): “Ganguly et al. [15] considered the semantic similarities between vocabulary terms to smooth document language models.”
- A Dual Embedding Space Model for Document Ranking (2016, background): “[9] recently proposed a generalized language model for IR that incorporates IN-IN similarities.”
- Neural information retrieval: at the end of the early years (2017, methodology): “…et al. 2015; Grbovic et al. 2015b; Mitra 2015; Severyn and Moschitti 2015; Vulic and Moens 2015; Zheng and Callan 2015), spanning ad-hoc search (Ganguly et al. 2015; Vulic and Moens 2015; Zheng and Callan 2015; Zuccon et al. 2015), QA sentence selection and Twitter reranking (Kenter and de…”
- Query Expansion Using Word Embeddings (2016, methodology): “Document embeddings [5, 2] and word-embeddings-based translation models [8, 21] were also used for retrieval.”
- A Comparison of Word Embeddings for the Biomedical Natural Language Processing (2018, background): “There has been an increasing number of studies applying word embeddings in common NLP tasks, such as information extraction (IE) [4], [5], [6], information retrieval (IR) [7], sentiment analysis [8], [9], question answering [10], [11], and text summarization [12], [13].”
- Embedding-based Query Language Models (2016, methodology): “The main difference between this paper and the existing work is that we focus on estimating accurate query language models which efficiently outperforms the embedding-based document language models [10].”
- Generalizing Translation Models in the Probabilistic Relevance Framework (2016, methodology): “Other recent studies have combined language modelling and distributional semantics: Ganguly et al. [8] expand the classic language models through word embedding-based noisy channels which aim to discover the hidden dependencies between terms.”
- Critically Examining the "Neural Hype": Weak Baselines and the Additivity of Effectiveness Gains from Neural Ranking Models (2019, background): “While there are much more sophisticated approaches to integrating multiple relevance signals, this approach is commonly used [6, 16, 19, 24, 26].”
- BioWordVec, improving biomedical word embeddings with subword information and MeSH (2019, methodology): “Based on word embeddings, the recent deep learning methods have been successfully applied to various natural language processing (NLP) tasks 4–6 .”
- Analysis of the Paragraph Vector Model for Information Retrieval (2016, background): “Ganguly et al. [7] and Zuccon et al. [27] applied word embeddings in the translation language model framework.”
- Provably Confidential Language Modelling (2022, background): “Language models (LM) have rich real-world applications in, among others, machine translation (Bahdanau et al., 2015), AI chatbots (Hosseini-Asl et al., 2020), question answering (Kwiatkowski et al., 2019), and information retrieval (Ganguly et al., 2015).”
- Incorporating Query Term Independence Assumption for Efficient Retrieval and Ranking using Deep Neural Networks (2019, methodology): “Several neural IR methods—e.g., [Ganguly et al., 2015, Kenter and De Rijke, 2015, Nalisnick et al., 2016, Guo et al., 2016]—already operate under query term independence assumption.”
- Semantic Matching by Non-Linear Word Transportation for Information Retrieval (2016, methodology): “for IR was proposed in [12], where query words are assumed to be generated in three ways, i.”