THE HAWAII INFRARED PARALLAX PROGRAM. I. ULTRACOOL BINARIES AND THE L/T TRANSITION,

By T. Dupuy, Michael C. Liu. 2012

473 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present the first results from our high-precision infrared (IR) astrometry program at the Canada–France–Hawaii Telescope. We measure parallaxes for 83 ultracool dwarfs (spectral types M6–T9) in 49 systems, with a median uncertainty of 1.1 mas (2.3%) and as good as 0.7 mas (0.8%). We provide the first parallaxes for 48 objects in 29 systems, and for another 27 objects in 17 systems, we significantly improve upon published results, with a median (best) improvement of 1.7 times (5 times). Three systems show astrometric perturbations indicative of orbital motion; two are known binaries (2MASS J0518−2828AB and 2MASS J1404−3159AB) and one is spectrally peculiar (SDSS J0805+4812). In addition, we present here a large set of Keck adaptive optics imaging that more than triples the number of binaries with L6–T5 components that have both multi-band photometry and distances. Our data enable an unprecedented look at the photometric properties of brown dwarfs as they cool through the L/T transition. Going from ≈L8 to ≈T4.5, flux in the Y and J bands increases by ≈0.7 mag and ≈0.5 mag, respectively (the Y- and J-band “bumps”), while flux in the H, K, and L′ bands declines monotonically. This wavelength dependence is consistent with cloud clearing over a narrow range of temperature, since condensate opacity is expected to dominate at 1.0–1.3 μm. Interestingly, despite more than doubling the near-IR census of L/T transition objects, we find a conspicuous paucity of objects on the color–magnitude diagram just blueward of the late-L/early-T sequence. This “L/T gap” occurs at (J − H)MKO = 0.1–0.3 mag, (J − K)MKO = 0.0–0.4 mag, and implies that the last phases of cloud evolution occur rapidly. Finally, we provide a comprehensive update to the absolute magnitudes of ultracool dwarfs as a function of spectral type using a combined sample of 314 objects.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/542c726243a022b9922491180095fdb2f7b3d842

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Michael C. Liu
  2. T. Dupuy
  3. M. Marley
  4. A. Burgasser
  5. B. Bowler
  6. K. Allers
  7. Kelle Cruz
  8. Jon Fortney

In Instrumentation

  1. Michael C. Liu
  2. T. Dupuy
  3. A. Burgasser
  4. M. Marley
  5. K. Allers
  6. Kelle Cruz
  7. B. Bowler
  8. K. Luhman

Citations in the corpus