Testing for Local Spatial Autocorrelation in the Presence of Global Autocorrelation
By J. Keith Ord, Arthur Getis. 2001
339 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/541d0c9c89ccdef32202edfe14776fa838578d22
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Daniel A. Griffith
- Antonio Páez
- Arthur Getis
- Darren M. Scott
- David C. Wheeler
- Luc Anselin
- Stéphane Dray
- P. Peres‐Neto
Citations in the corpus
- Comparative Spatial Filtering in Regression Analysis (2002, methodology): “It is directly related to the type of spatial autocorrelation (association) measured in the various G and O (Ord and Getis 2001) statistics.”
- Spatial statistics for urban analysis: A review of techniques with examples (2004, background): “…of local spatial effects, two local statistics of spatial association have received considerable attention in the last 10 years: the Getis and Ord family of G i (d) statistics (Getis and Ord, 1993; Ord and Getis, 1995, 2001 ) and Anselin's LISA (Local Indicators of Spatial Association ; 1995).”
- A General Framework for Estimation and Inference of Geographically Weighted Regression Models: 1. Location-Specific Kernel Bandwidths and a Test for Locational Heterogeneity (2002, background): “The problem in the case of spatial data is that the tests are likely to be highly dependent, as discussed by Ord and Getis (1995; 2001) and Anselin (1995) in the context of local statistics of spatial association.”