Group Identification under Conditions of Threat: College Students' Attachment to Country, Family, Ethnicity, Religion, and University Before and After September 11, 2001

112 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Rival conceptions of rivalry: why some competitions mean more than others (2015, unknown): “These examples of more frequent interaction of opposing fans due to geographic proximity typify the notion that an increased out-group presence will increase feelings of threat among the in-group and strengthen members’ group identification (Moskalenko et al., 2006; Wann & Grieve, 2005).”
Explaining Group Influence: The Role of Identity and Emotion in Political Conformity and Polarization (2015, background): “The relevant group in the experiment is college peers, a highly relevant social identity for many undergraduate students (Alwin, Cohen, and Newcomb 1991; Moskalenko, McCauley, and Rozin 2006).”
The psychology of lone-wolf terrorism (2011, background): “Identification with another means caring about the welfare of the other (Moskalenko, McCauley, & Rozin, 2006 ).”
Religiosity as Identity: Toward an Understanding of Religion From a Social Identity Perspective (2010, background): “Interestingly, levels of religious identity salience (primarily Catholic, Protestant, and Jewish) were significantly higher among American university students 4 days following those attacks than they were 6 months afterward (Moskalenko et al., 2006), suggesting that the relation between identificati”