The impact of predator control on lapwing Vanellus vanellus breeding success on wet grassland nature reserves
By M. Bolton, G. Tyler, Ken W. Smith, R. Bamford. 2007
145 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Parasitology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5406a1d3c9bba6df3bea6f8780e9ad1b3239ce75
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
In Parasitology
Citations in the corpus
- Identifying predators of eggs and chicks of Lapwing Vanellus vanellus and Black‐tailed Godwit Limosa limosa in the Netherlands and the importance of predation on wader reproductive output (2008, background): “Red Foxes and Carrion Crows were generally presumed to be the most important predators by farmers, local volunteers involved in clutch protection and conservationists (cf. Bolton et al. 2007).”
- Bird demographic responses to predator removal programs (2010, unknown): “…P a 0.47 0.09 h 0.71 0.82 Parr (1993) and Piersma et al. (2005) Lapwing Vanellus vanellus 234 23 S Red fox and Carrion Crow P a 0.26 0.34 0.60 0.75 Bolton et al. (2007) and Peach et al. (1994) Many, primarily red fox P a 0.66 0.39 Isaksson et al. (2007) Redshank Tringa totanus 159 20 S Many,…”
- Shared resources between giant panda and sympatric wild and domestic mammals (2015, methodology): “We implemented the model in the software WinBUGS accessed through the program RStudio, version 0.98.977 using the package R2WinBUGS (BRugs et al., 2013).”
- BirdTrends 2014: trends in numbers, breeding success and survival for UK breeding birds (2014, background): “…rates resulting from habitat changes due to agricultural intensification (Baines 1990, Liker & Szekely 1997, Jackson & Green 2000, Chamberlain & Crick 2003, Evans 2004, Jackson et al. 2004, Milsom 2005, Bolton et al. 2007, Teunissen et al. 2008, MacDonald & Bolton 2008b, Bellebaum & Bock 2009).”
- Predation in bird populations (2011, background): “But others have shown that predator numbers or predator presence do not change prey numbers (e.g. Bolton et al. 2007; Holt et al. 2008; Amar et al. 2010).”