Nuclear modification factor of D0 mesons in PbPb collisions at sNN=5.02TeV
By A. Sirunyan, A. Tumasyan, W. Adam, Federico Ambrogi, E. Asilar, T. Bergauer, J. Brandstetter, E. Brondolin, M. Dragicevic, J. Eroe and 2,201 more. Physics Letters B, 2017
145 citations recorded by the source corpus.
The transverse momentum (p_T) spectrum of prompt D^0 mesons and their antiparticles has been measured via the hadronic decay channels D^0 → K^−π^+ and D^‾0 → K^+π^− in pp and PbPb collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of 5.02 TeV per nucleon pair with the CMS detector at the LHC. The measurement is performed in the D^0 meson p_T range of 2–100GeV/c and in the rapidity range of |y| < 1. The pp (PbPb) dataset used for this analysis corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 27.4 pb^(−1) (530 μb^(−1)). The measured D^0 meson p_T spectrum in pp collisions is well described by perturbative QCD calculations. The nuclear modification factor, comparing D0 meson yields in PbPb and pp collisions, was extracted for both minimum-bias and the 10% most central PbPb interactions. For central events, the D^0 meson yield in the PbPb collisions is suppressed by a factor of 5–6 compared to the ppreference in the p_T range of 6–10GeV/c. For D^0 mesons in the high-p_T range of 60–100GeV/c, a significantly smaller suppression is observed. The results are also compared to theoretical calculations.
Subfields: Nuclear and High Energy Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/53f65cb0aeefcf9db589581c4b62ed87d8c3b64b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Nuclear and High Energy Physics
Citations in the corpus
- The Muon Puzzle in cosmic-ray induced air showers and its connection to the Large Hadron Collider (2021, background): “…at RHIC in Au-Au collisions and has been extensively studied in Pb-Pb and Xe-Xe at the LHC (Adcox et al. 2002; Arsene 2013; Balek 2014; Jung 2014; Sirunyan et al. 2018d, 2017b; Aaboud et al. 2019b; Sirunyan et al. 2018a, 2019b; Khachatryan et al. 2017a; Acharya et al. 2019d, 2018; Adam et al.…”