Comment on Cercignani’s second-order slip coefficient

207 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Fokker–Planck model for computational studies of monatomic rarefied gas flows (2011, background): “Cercignani’s second-order slip model (Cercignani 1964) provides much more accurate results in the mentioned problem (Hadjiconstantinou 2003).”
Phonon hydrodynamics and its applications in nanoscale heat transport (2015, unknown): “(82) is a first-order boundary, which is later generalized to secondorder by Cercignani [214,215]:”
Challenges in Modeling Gas-Phase Flow in Microchannels: From Slip to Transition (2006, background): “One possible explanation has been proposed by Hadjiconstantinou [ 45 ], who showed that considerable care is required in interpreting the experimental data, as the values of A 2 are derived from mass flow rate measurements and not from direct observations of the slip-velocity.”
A novel experimental setup for gas microflows (2010, background): “Recently, Hadjiconstantinou (2003) suggested to keep the value b = 1.1466 from Cercignani and to modify A2 as A2 = -0.647.”