Size matters: why nanomaterials are different.

By Emil Roduner. Chemical Society Reviews, 2006

2,105 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Biomedical Engineering, Materials Chemistry

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/53df5d66f44436bad383adbe4fca3efb554743a0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atmospheric Science

1. T. Ahmad
2. Chang Q. Sun
3. K. Robbie
4. Matteo Bonomo
5. I. Pacheco
6. Yadong Li
7. C. Buzea
8. Dingsheng Wang

In Biomedical Engineering

1. P. Srinoi
2. T. Ahmad
3. Yi-Ting Chen
4. Ting Xie
5. T. Randall Lee
6. Varadee Vittur
7. Chang Q. Sun
8. Maria D. Marquez

In Materials Chemistry

1. Yadong Li
2. Dingsheng Wang
3. P. Srinoi
4. T. Ahmad
5. Yi-Ting Chen
6. Ting Xie
7. T. Randall Lee
8. Varadee Vittur

Citations in the corpus

• Nanoparticle classification, physicochemical properties, characterization, and applications: a comprehensive review for biologists (2022, neutral): “6–9, 11, 12, 15, and 20 atom-containing clusters are very reactive, while clusters with 10, 13, 14, and 19 atoms have low reactivity [14].”
• Biosynthesis of nanoparticles and silver nanoparticles (2015, background): “Moreover, there is a new branch of nanotechnology existing, which is bio-nanotechnology that integrates principles of biology with physical and chemical procedures to generate nano-sized particles with specific functions (Kathiresan et al. 2009; Qi and Wang 2004; Roduner 2006).”