Ontogenetic shifts in interactions among annual plants

By K. Schiffers, Katja Tielbörger. 2006

167 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/53df0c57c89ce5f0a50ee94fe306f792ae90c888

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Testing the roles of competition, facilitation and stochasticity on community structure in a species‐rich assemblage (2014, background): “Furthermore, as it happens in many other systems (Flores-Martínez, Ezcurra & S anchezCol on 1994; Miriti 2006; Schiffers & Tielb€orger 2006; Valiente-Banuet and Verd u, 2008, Fayolle, Violle & Navas 2009), interactions shifted over ontogeny.”
Transient facilitative effects of heather on Scots pine along a grazing disturbance gradient in Scottish moorland (2006, result): “…beneficial effect of neighbours being offset by a second, dominant and negative effect of the same individuals, supporting previous studies that demonstrated temporal variability in plant–plant interactions (e.g. Goldberg & Novoplansky 1997; Bellingham & Coomes 2003; Schiffers & Tielbörger 2006).”
Facilitation in plant communities: the past, the present, and the future (2007, background): “These include relatively short-term experiments, a lack of adequate control for the occurrence of multiple stress factors or ontogenetic effects (but see Armas & Pugnaire 2005; Miriti 2006; Schiffers & Tielbörger 2006), or the effects of resource vs. non-resource stress factors (Michalet 2007).”
Spatio-temporal heterogeneity in abiotic factors modulate multiple ontogenetic shifts between competition and facilitation (2010, background): “…separation between grasses and shrubs, and therefore a reduction of competition (e.g. Armas and Pugnaire 2005; our case) or in a niche overlap, which together with the increase in biomass can lead to higher competition (e.g. Miriti, 2006 for shrubs; Schiffers and Tielbörger, 2006 for annuals).”
Where do seedlings go? A spatio-temporal analysis of seedling mortality in a semi-arid gypsophyte (2008, background): “…shifts with changes in environmental conditions (e.g. competitive interactions could predominate in the benign, early months of the growing season, whereas facilitative interactions could predominate later on as more xeric conditions prevail; Schiffers and Tielborger 2006, Kikvidze et al. 2006.”
Ontogenetic shifts in interactions of two dominant shrub species in a semi‐arid coastal sand dune system (2009, background): “…time, during one life stage or using only one response variable is insufficient for drawing valid conclusions about long-term effects on population dynamics (Schiffers & Tielbörger 2006) or community responses to changing conditions (Tielbörger & Kadmon 2000; Brooker 2006; Brooker et al. 2008).”
Plant Facilitation and Phylogenetics (2013, background): “…initial spatial association between seedlings of facilitated plants and their nurses disappears when seedlings become adults, suggesting that facilitation may turn into competition along the ontogeny of the nurse and the facilitated species (Callaway & Walker 1997, Schiffers & Tielbörger 2006).”
Direct and indirect interactions co‐determine species composition in nurse plant systems (2013, background): “These factors are known to affect net interaction intensity significantly (Callaway et al. 2002, Schiffers and Tielbörger 2006, Armas and Pugnaire 2009) and may, therefore, also be associated with variation in both the direct nurse effect and indirect beneficiary effects on beneficiary species.”